This is a new assignment for Summer Camp - last year, we emphasized the importance of planning ahead when using Web 2.0 tools, but we didn't give concrete examples of what problems might crop up. This assignment was created to help you get a step ahead of your students and take a proactive stance when dealing with internet misbehavior.
I'd argue that most of these hypothetical situations could easily be avoided by clearly outlining your expectations before students start using whatever tool you're sharing with them. Our district has a generic permission slip for students to use online accounts, but you should be sure to share your plans with families in advance, giving them the choice to opt out (and letting them know how that impacts their student's learning, outlining the other ways their child can complete the work). Your principal should also know ahead of time what you're doing and how it fits into your curriculum.
Besides having parent and principal support, you also need students to buy in. They need to know what's expected of them and what the consequences are if they misbehave. The consequences aren't necessarily just you preventing them from using the tool or restricting computer privileges - talk about their digital footprints and how impossible it is to take back something once it's posted online.
Scenarios 1, 3, and 7 are situations where students don't realize how their inappropriate conduct could haunt them later on. In Scenario 1, students using Google Drive to peer review work are using the comments tool to insult each other. We had elementary students figure out early on that they can use comments to chat with each other during work time, and that they could easily create a new document that wasn't shared with a teacher. We had students call each other names and harass each other, but the only way teachers found out was if a student told us. Those documents quickly spun out of control, since kids could easily share it with each other and even with students in other buildings. We can't lock down the collaborative features; that's one of the strengths of Google Drive is having those features available. Instead, we need to be clear upfront about our expectations and hold students accountable.
In Scenario 3, the teacher didn't want to create individual blog accounts for students, so she talked about acceptable use and let kids blog anonymously. The students figured out pretty quickly that their comments couldn't be traced back to them, and they posted hurtful and inappropriate comments. Creating accounts (and talking about the importance of not sharing passwords!) would have prevented this problem in the first place. Scenario 7 is similar, since students used a class YouTube account to post screencasts. However, students posted inappropriate videos instead and changed the privacy settings. Videos that were meant to be viewed only by the class were publicly available, shared and commented on by the outside world. This violated students' privacy, especially those without photo permission. If students had their own accounts or had just shared their screencasts with the teacher, she could have posted them appropriately.
There's no way we can stay a step ahead of our students with technology, no matter how tech-savvy we think we are. They're the digital natives! But we need to teach them about digital citizenship from an early age, think carefully about our online assignments, monitor their online work for our classes, and hold them accountable for their behavior. Online tools blur the line between home and school, so we need families to help us, too.